The topic of euthanasia and physician is very controversial in my household, something I do not know what to feel about it. Reading this article from However, The National Post may have helped me get some things clear in my mind. The article talks about the state of Oregon and the Death With Dignity Act, which protects patients, doctors, and pharmacists who adhere to some of the many rules from criminal prosecution (Lewis, 2012). The Death With Dignity Act differs from euthanasia, which is punishable by law and illegal. The overriding difference between the two is that the drug must be self-administered (Lewis, 2012). Also, the actual act of dying is not done on whim. The patient must make a written request signed in the presence of two witnesses and must take two oral requests by his or her doctor that are separated by 15 days (Lewis, 2012).
Taken from http://www.pewforum.org/uploadedImages/Topics/Issues/Science_and_Bioethics/oregon_large%281%29.jpg |
I will probably have more to say about this, but this is all I can coherently muster right now.
Reference:
Lewis, C. (2012, June 22). What oregon’s experience can teach us about assisted suicide. National Post. Retrieved June 22, 2012, from http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/06/22/what-oregons-experience-can-teach-us-about-assisted-suicide/
No comments:
Post a Comment